🟢 Beginner Level — Session 4
The art of speaking to AI (prompting)
“Applied AI” program — Instructor: Yann Isola Public: general public, from 12 years old — no technical prerequisites Recommended duration: 2 hours (can be adjusted from 1h30 to 2h30)
📋 Session overview
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Main objective | Know how to write a good prompt and improve a response by iteration |
| Key message | The quality of the question determines the quality of the answer |
| Material | Video projector, access to an AI chatbot (ChatGPT, Le Chat de Mistral, Claude, Gemini…), interactive web page of the session |
| Student deliverables | “Perfect prompt recipe” sheet, completed exercises, quiz |
Educational objectives
At the end of the session, each participant knows:
- Define what is a prompt in your own words
- Identify the 5 ingredients of a good prompt (context, role, task, format, constraints)
- Transform a vague prompt into a precise prompt
- Iterate : rephrase and clarify when the answer is not appropriate
- Cut out a large request in small steps (prompt chaining)
⏱ Unfolded minute by minute (2h)
| Time | Activity | Format |
|---|---|---|
| 0:00–0:10 | Home + session 3 reminder + shock demo “same question, two prompts” | Plenary |
| 0:10–0:25 | Part 1: What is a prompt? Garbage in, garbage out | Interactive presentation |
| 0:25–0:50 | Part 2: The 5 ingredients of a good prompt | Presentation + live demos |
| 0:50–1:00 | ☕ Break | — |
| 1:00–1:15 | Part 3: Simple techniques (lists, tables, steps) + the power of the role | Live demos |
| 1:15–1:30 | Part 4: Iterate + prompt chaining | Presentation + demo |
| 1:30–1:50 | 🏆 Activity: the prompt competition | Team workshops |
| 1:50–2:00 | Quiz + summary + teaser session 5 | Plenary |
🎬 Opening: the shock demo (10 min)
Objective : create the “wow” effect from the first minute.
Project a live chatbot. Type these two prompts one after the other:
Prompt A (wave):
“Tell me about volcanoes. »
Prompt B (precise):
“You are a passionate museum guide who speaks to 10-year-old children. Explains how a volcano erupts, in 5 numbered steps, with a fun comparison per step (for example with a bottle of soda). Maximum 10 lines. »
Let the class compare the two answers. Ask the question:
“The AI is the same. What has changed? »
Expected response: the question . That’s the whole subject of the session.
⚠ Volatile point: interfaces and models evolve quickly. Test your demos the day before of the session — exact answers vary from day to day and from tool to tool. This is normal, and it is even a good point to mention to students.
📖 Part 1 — What is a prompt? (15 mins)
Simple definition
A prompt (English word meaning “invite” or “instruction”) is the message you send to the AI : a question, an instruction, a request. That's all the AI knows about what you want.
Key analogy to use: order at the restaurant.
- “I want to eat. » → the waiter brings anything.
- “I would like a margherita pizza, thin crust, without olives, please. » → you get exactly what you want.
AI is like an ultra-competent server but which don't read your mind .
“Garbage in, garbage out”
English expression which means “waste in, waste out”. In other words: if the question is unclear, the answer will be unclear. The AI doesn't guess what's in your head — it only knows the words you give it.
Points to hammer home:
- AI is not a soothsayer. She doesn't know your background, your age, or your goal — unless you tell her.
- A bad result is not always the fault of the AI: it is often the fault of the prompt.
- Good news: writing a good prompt can be learned in one session. It's today!
Mini-interaction
Ask: “Who has ever been disappointed by an AI response?” » Collect 2-3 anecdotes. Rephrase: “What if we rewrote the question together at the end of class? » (Save them for the final competition.)
🧑🍳 Part 2 — The 5 ingredients of a good prompt (25 min)
Present the recipe : like in cooking, a good prompt combines ingredients. You don't need 5 every time, but the more you add, the more precise the answer.
1. 🌍 CONTEXT — “This is my situation”
What the AI needs to know about you and your situation.
“I’m in 5th grade and I have a presentation on bees on Friday. »
2. 🎭 The ROLE — “You are…”
The character that the AI should play. This changes the tone and level of the response enormously.
“You are a SVT (Life and Earth Sciences) teacher who loves bees. »
Unmissable live demo: ask the same math question (“Explain fractions to me”) three times:
- Without role
- “You are a math teacher for 6th grade students”
- “You are a pastry chef who explains fractions with cakes”
The three answers will be radically different. Guaranteed effect.
3. 🎯 The TASK — “Do this”
Whatever you want, with a specific action verb : explains, summarizes, compares, corrects, translates, invents, list…
“Tell me how bees make honey. »
4. 📐 The FORMAT — “Present it like this”
The form of the response: bulleted list, table, numbered steps, short text, dialogue, poem, etc.
“In the form of 5 numbered steps. »
5. 🚧 CONSTRAINTS — “With these limits”
The rules to respect: length, language level, tone, things to avoid…
“In 3 sentences maximum”, “for a 10 year old child”, “with emojis”, “without complicated words”.
The complete assembled prompt
« [Context] I'm in 5th grade and I'm preparing a presentation on bees. [Role] You are a passionate SVT teacher. [Stain] Explain to me how bees make honey, [Format] in 5 numbered steps, [Constraints] with simple sentences and one emoji per step. »
Mnemonic device: have the class come up with an acronym using C-R-T-F-C, or suggest the phrase: “ C haque R quest T finds F easily C hemin.” The important thing is not the order, but the presence of the ingredients.
⚡ Part 3 — Simple techniques that change everything (15 min)
Request a structure
Show live the difference between:
- “Give me gift ideas” → text pad
- “Give me 5 gift ideas in list form , with the approximate price for each » → clear list
- « …in table form with the columns: idea, price, for whom » → readable table
Magic words to display on the board:
- “Make me one list of… »
- “Present this in a painting with the columns…”
- “Explain in numbered steps »
- « Summarized in 3 sentences »
- “Give a example for each point »
The power of the role (deepening)
Explain why it works (simple version): the AI has read millions of texts. When we say to her “you are a 6th grade teacher”, she “activates” everything that resembles this context: simple vocabulary, friendly tone, adapted examples. Without a role, she takes on a medium, all-purpose tone.
Constraints in practice
Quick game: ask the class to propose crazy constraints for the question “Explain gravity”: in 3 sentences / for a 5-year-old child / with emojis / sports commentator style / in a poem. Test 2-3 live. Laughter guaranteed, and the lesson passes: constraint sculpts the response .
🔁 Part 4 — Iterate and chain (15 min)
Iterate: the conversation, not the single question
Essential message: missing your first answer is NORMAL. Even professionals adjust their prompts. The AI remembers the current conversation: there is no need to repeat everything, we clarify.
Examples of reminders to display:
- “It’s too long, summarized in 5 lines. »
- “Too complicated, explain like I’m 10 years old. »
- “Good, but give concrete examples. »
- “Start again with a funnier tone. »
Analogy: it’s like sculpting. The first prompt gives a rough block, each restart refines the shape.
Prompt chaining
“Chaining of prompts” = break down a large request into small steps , one per message, like a chain of links.
Common thread example: prepare a presentation on dolphins
- “Give me 5 plan ideas for a presentation on dolphins (5th grade). »
- “Develop plan #2 in 3 parts with 2 ideas per part. »
- “Write the introduction, 5 sentences maximum, with a compelling question. »
- “Propose 3 questions that the class could ask me, with short answers. »
Why is it better than asking everything at once?
- We keep control at each step (you can correct before continuing)
- Each answer is more neat because the request is simpler
- We understand what we build (instead of copying a ready-made block)
⚠ Volatile point: some recent tools are getting better and better at handling complex requests in one go. Chaining nevertheless remains the most reliable and educational method to get started.
🏆 Key activity — The prompt competition (20 min)
Principle
The teams compete: who will write the prompt that produces the best response for a given challenge?
Organization
- Teams of 2-3 people.
- Announce it challenge (choose according to the audience):
- 🥇 Challenge 1: “Obtain the best explanation of photosynthesis for an 8 year old child”
- 🥈 Challenge 2: “Obtain the best birthday menu for 10 people with €50”
- 🥉 Challenge 3: “Obtain the best rules for an invented game that can be played in class without equipment”
- Each team writes its prompt on paper (5 min) — this avoids tinkering directly and forces reflection.
- Each team dictates its prompt, you type it live on the video projector (where the teams use their stations).
- The class vote for the best answer (not the best prompt!).
- Debrief: analyze the winning prompt using the 5 ingredient grid. How many did he have?
Evaluation grid (to be projected)
| Ingredient | Here ? |
|---|---|
| 🌍 Background | |
| 🎭 Role | |
| 🎯 Clear task | |
| 📐 Requested format | |
| 🚧 Constraints |
Variant without screen
If not enough positions: the trainer is the “human AI” and voluntarily responds literally. Prompt vague → answer deliberately off the mark. Very funny and very effective educationally.
❓ Frequently asked questions from students (and ready answers)
“Should we be polite to AI? Say please? » This is not obligatory, the AI does not have feelings. But studies suggest that clearly and politely worded prompts sometimes yield slightly better responses — mostly because they are better structured. And it’s a good communication habit!
“Why doesn’t the AI understand my question? » She “understands” the words, not your hidden intentions. Reread your prompt as if you were someone else: is it really clear?
“If I put all 5 ingredients, the answer is still perfect? » No ! The AI can make mistakes even with a perfect prompt (previous session reminder: hallucinations). A good prompt increases the chances, it does not guarantee them. We always check.
“Is a long prompt better? » Not necessarily. A long but confusing prompt is worse than a short and clear prompt. The rule: clear first, then complete .
“Does it work the same on all tools? » ⚠ The main principles (the 5 ingredients) work everywhere: ChatGPT, Le Chat, Claude, Gemini, Copilot… The interface details change, the principles remain.
⚠️ Points of vigilance for the trainer
- Test all your demos the day before — the models change, the answers too.
- Have backup screenshots in case the network falls or the tool is saturated.
- Remind the rules of use : no personal data in the prompts (full name, address, passwords) — link with the session on privacy.
- Don't present prompting as a magic formula : it’s a communication skill, not a secret code.
- Adapt the competition challenges to the public (teenagers: games, presentations; adults: emails, organization, cooking).
- GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) : If you use shared accounts in class, do not enter any personal data from the participants.
Summary to note (end of session)
- A prompt = the instruction given to the AI. That’s all she knows about our need.
- Fuzzy question → fuzzy answer (“garbage in, garbage out”).
- The recipe: Context + Role + Task + Format + Constraints .
- The magic words: list, table, numbered steps, “in X sentences”, “for a child of X years”.
- Iterating is normal : we specify, we reformulate, we refine.
- For large requests: one step at a time (chaining).
- A good prompt improves the response but we always check the facts.
Teaser session 5: “Now that you know how to talk to AI…let’s find out what it can do other than text!” »
Teacher document — Applied AI Program — Yann Isola — Beginner Level 🟢 — Session 4/10